Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 has a score of 85, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy M40 has the older 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Galaxy M40 is a somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has 2 GB more RAM. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way better screen than Galaxy M40, because although it has a just a bit lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The Galaxy M40 counts with a greater camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot lower 32 MP resolution back facing camera. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little bit better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.