Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 12 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2022-04-07 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 8.69 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has a general score of 76.7, which is just a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has an older 12 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy M53 5G design is thinner and lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, a bit better display density and a little larger display.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. OSCAL Tiger 12 and Galaxy M53 5G count with similar battery durations.
Galaxy M53 5G has a way better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.