Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is way better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with a 90.8 score against 71.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a a little bit lighter phone than OSCAL Tiger 12, but both of them are equally thin. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a quite larger display and a just a little better pixel number in each inch of display.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note 20 features a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.