Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, with a global score of 98.9 against 71.5. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is a little bit thinner but just a bit heavier than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 13 OS (Operating System), so both of them should give you all the same OS features.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little bit lower number of pixels per inch in the screen, a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a little smaller screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a lot better 108 megapixels resolution camera. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.