Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting an 80.4 score against 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a a little thinner and lighter cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a bit lower number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 and the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition both count with extremely similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much lower resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.