Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. The Galaxy Note10 is a just a little thinner and lighter cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 12. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little lower pixel count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bit bigger screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Galaxy Note10 counts with a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with a way lower resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.