Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having a score of 86.2 against 71.5. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has an older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than OSCAL Tiger 12.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features just a bit better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 features an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a quite larger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much less mega pixels resolution camera in the back. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.