Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 is slightly better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a 77.7 score against 71.5. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has newer 4.4.2 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version, providing the user some nice extra features and performance tweaks. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 body has the same thickness than the OSCAL Tiger 12, but it is lighter.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a bigger screen, a little greater screen density and a quite better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note3 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back facing camera. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.