Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 is a little bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, with a general score of 77.6 against 71.5. Galaxy Note4 is a somewhat lighter device than the OSCAL Tiger 12, but both of them have the same thickness. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much sharper display than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note4 takes much better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 55% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.