Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, with a 79.5 score against 71.5. Galaxy Note7 is a a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter phone than OSCAL Tiger 12. OSCAL Tiger 12 features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a larger display.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note7, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores (and they are faster). The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with way less MP. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.