Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 has a global score of 83, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 general score. Galaxy Note8 is a a bit thicker but just a little lighter cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note8 has 9.0 Pie version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display and a lot worse 1080 x 2460px resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy Note8 features a bit superior processor than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note8 features a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.