Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with an 88.3 score against 71.5. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy S10 design is incredibly lighter and a little bit thinner than OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2460 resolution and way less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit superior processor than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have equal internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 47% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot worse resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.