Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is a lot better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a a little bit thinner and just a little lighter phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit more powerful processor than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM memory. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a just a little worse count of pixels per inch of display and a much lower 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy S10 5G takes better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.