Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a global score of 89.7 against 71.5. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a just a little lighter and a bit thinner device than OSCAL Tiger 12. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a bit bigger screen, a quite greater screen pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit superior processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a little better battery performance than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures much clearer photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.