Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is way better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having an 86.3 score against 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy S10e design is just a little thinner and noticeably lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features just a little better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.