Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is a lot better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having a score of 94.8 against 71.5. Galaxy S20 is a just a bit thinner and lighter cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. These devices use the same Android 13 operating system. Galaxy S20 has a bit faster processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2460 resolution and a way lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 captures much clearer pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. OSCAL Tiger 12 has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.