Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 general score. Both of these phones come with the same Android 13 OS (Operating System). The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a little thicker and heavier phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little inferior pixels amount per inch of display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration is just as good as OSCAL Tiger 12's battery duration. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a greater camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a camera in the back with a way better 108 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.