Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 is a lot better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with a general score of 91.8 against 71.5. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S21 has 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Galaxy S21 is a lighter and a little thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
The Galaxy S21 has a little faster CPU than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 8 GB of RAM memory. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy S21, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and way more brightness.
Samsung Galaxy S21 captures a lot better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21, and although they both have the same internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S21, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.