Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Phantom black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 Ultra is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a 98.1 score against 71.5. The Galaxy S21 Ultra construction is heavier and just a little thicker than OSCAL Tiger 12. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S21 Ultra has older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per screen inch and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2460, and they both have a same size display, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also counts with a much brighter display.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S21 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a little bit better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a camera with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a battery duration that's very similar to the OSCAL Tiger 12 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.