Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is heavier and just a bit thicker than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 13 OS (operating system).
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit superior processor than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, and they both have a display with the same size, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also counts with a way brighter screen.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery duration is very similar to the battery lifetime in OSCAL Tiger 12.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a way higher 108 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.