Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 8.69 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a global score of 76, which is a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's global score of 71.5. These devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has newer 14 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13, so it gives you a lot of extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a a little heavier but a bit thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a better screen than Galaxy S24 FE, because it has a little bigger screen, way more brightness, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a just a little better pixel number in each inch of screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has 7 more CPU cores. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with just a bit better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot lower 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.