Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.99 ounces | -- |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S24 Ultra has a score of 80.2, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Galaxy S24 Ultra has Android operating system, and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 operating system. Galaxy S24 Ultra is a a lot lighter and notably thinner cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a really superior performance than Galaxy S24 Ultra. Both have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has a just a bit worse pixels density and a much lower 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, they both have a screen of the same size.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra's battery life is just as good as OSCAL Tiger 12's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.