Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S5
32 GBSM-G901F
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Gold, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 has a global score of 80.8, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 general score. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S5 has the newer 4.4.2 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version, giving you a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. Samsung Galaxy S5's construction is just a bit thinner and notably lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy S5, because although it has a way worse display pixels density, it also counts with a much larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2460px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S5 has a bit superior processor than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
Galaxy S5 captures much better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much longer battery life than Galaxy S5, because it has a 79 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.