Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport is a little bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a general score of 77.8 against 71.5. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S5 Sport has a newer 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version, providing the user a couple additional features. The Galaxy S5 Sport is a lighter but just a little bit thicker cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 12.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit superior processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a really bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features much more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much worse 16 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.