Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | -- |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, getting an 80.9 score against 71.5. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has the older 5.0 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active design is notably lighter but a little thicker than OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a lot worse amount of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, it also counts with a lot larger display. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features just a little better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has 5 GB less RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an additional graphics co-processor. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.