Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a general score of 79.5, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 global score. Galaxy S7 is a notably lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S7, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy S7, because although it has way lesser pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse 1080 x 2460px resolution, it also counts with a way bigger screen and way more brightness. Galaxy S7 captures much better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.