Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active has a general score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Galaxy S7 Active's construction is thicker but a bit lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a brighter display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a lot worse count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a lot larger screen and much more brightness. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a little bit better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with a lot lower resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.