Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a global score of 78.1, which is slightly better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's global score of 71.5. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is a much lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much sharper display than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a much lower screen density, it also counts with a larger screen. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit faster processor than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a larger number of 2200 megahertz cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S7 edge has a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much less mega pixels back camera. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.