Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover 5 is a little bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a 78.1 score against 71.5. Galaxy XCover 5's design is somewhat lighter but just a bit thicker than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover 5 has older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a larger display and a much higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has 64 GB more internal memory.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a higher amount of RAM. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy XCover 5 features a bit better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.