Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 12 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 8.69 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is slightly better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with a global score of 77.6 against 71.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has older 12 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's construction is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro takes clearer photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels. The OSCAL Tiger 12 and the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro have similar storage to store more apps and games, they have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 23 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.