Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, Galaxy XCover Pro is a a little heavier and somewhat thicker device than OSCAL Tiger 12.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a processor that's just as good as the OSCAL Tiger 12 one, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with way less MP resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has longer battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.