Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 8.69 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's global score of 71.5. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a thinner and just a bit lighter cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2460px resolution and a just a bit worse pixel number in each screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.