Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, with a 94.6 score against 71.5. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is somewhat thinner but way heavier than OSCAL Tiger 12.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution camera. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.