Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 8.69 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 general score. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a incredibly heavier but much thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a little greater screen density. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. OSCAL Tiger 12 features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
OSCAL Tiger 12 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.