Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 409.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia Z5 is just a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, with a 77.6 score against 71.5. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia Z5 has 5.1 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Xperia Z5 is a thinner and much lighter device than OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a more vivid screen than Xperia Z5, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a lot larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z5, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xperia Z5 features a little bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xperia Z5 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Xperia Z5 takes much better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot worse 23 MP resolution camera.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia Z5, because it has a 72 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.