Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 12 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.99 ounces | -- |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra has an overall score of 81, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 global score. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi 12S Ultra has an older 12 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra construction is way lighter and thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel quantity in each screen inch and a way worse 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with much more brightness and a little bit larger screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much greater processing power than Xiaomi 12S Ultra. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, because it has a 4% more battery size.
Xiaomi 12S Ultra takes much better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with a much worse 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.