Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2024-02-22 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.75 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14 Ultra is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having an 84.4 score against 71.5. Even being the best cellphone in this review, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra design is just a little bit thicker and just a little heavier than the OSCAL Tiger 12. These phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi 14 Ultra has the newer 14 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because although it has a little bit worse pixels count in each display inch and a way worse 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and way more brightness. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much powerful processor than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra's battery life is just as good as the battery performance in OSCAL Tiger 12.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with way less mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.