Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, with a general score of 80.4 against 71.5. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark has newer 9.0 Pie version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13, so it provides you a couple additional features. The Xiaomi Black Shark construction is a little bit thicker but just a bit lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a just a little worse pixel quantity per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460px, way more brightness and a little bigger screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Black Shark features a bit superior processor than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Black Shark has a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much less MP camera. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has greater battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.