Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a overall score of 86.6 against 71.5. Xiaomi Black Shark 3's construction is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the older 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features just a bit better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460, a just a bit greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a quite larger display.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. OSCAL Tiger 12 features just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 captures much clearer videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of them have a back camera with a 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.