Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 93.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-04-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Alpine white and Solstice grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.86 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a 93.1 score against 71.5. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro's body is a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because it has a little more pixels per screen inch, a really brighter screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a much more mega pixels camera in the back. OSCAL Tiger 12 has just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.