Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-06-05 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.10 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 56.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 8 is better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a score of 83.3 against 71.5. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 8 has 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. Xiaomi Mi 8's design is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Xiaomi Mi 8 counts with just a bit better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a lot better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 8, because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a little bit bigger screen and way more brightness. The Xiaomi Mi 8 takes better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 8, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a very superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.