Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.80 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Gold and Red |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2244 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3120mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 8 SE is just a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with a 75.9 score against 71.5. The Xiaomi Mi 8 SE works with Android OS, and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 OS. The Xiaomi Mi 8 SE body is just a bit thinner and lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 12. OSCAL Tiger 12 and Xiaomi Mi 8 SE both have really similar processing units, and although the Xiaomi Mi 8 SE has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a way brighter screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 8 SE has a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because it has a 60 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.