Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-03-06 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.10 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue and Purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 is better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having an 83.2 score against 71.5. Xiaomi Mi 9 is a just a little thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way better screen than Xiaomi Mi 9, because although it has a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with way more brightness, a little bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 9 counts with a bit superior processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi 9 captures greater photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with lot less MP resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.