Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having an 81.4 score against 71.5. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a newer 9.0 Pie version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13, so it provides a couple nice extra features. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE construction is lighter and thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution, a quite larger display and way more brightness. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a little bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a very superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.