Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Blue, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi A3 is better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a global score of 79.2 against 71.5. The Xiaomi Mi A3 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 12, but they are equally thin. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi A3 has the older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better looking display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a better display pixels density and a quite bigger screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has more RAM. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4030mAh. Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a very superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much worse 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.