Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has an overall score of 84.3, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 score. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has the newer 14 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a heavier but extremely thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a bit smaller display, a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a much brighter screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a bit longer battery lifetime than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a greater camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lot less MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.