Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-11-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a general score of 83.7 against 71.5. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a a bit heavier and thicker cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has the older 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has a quite lower pixel number in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a quite bigger screen and much more brightness. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10's processing unit is just as good as OSCAL Tiger 12's CPU, and although the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a little better battery lifetime than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.