Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a global score of 80.6, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 score. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's body is just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has an older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with much more brightness, a quite bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460. OSCAL Tiger 12 and Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite have quite similar processing units, and although the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite captures greater photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of them have a same resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.