Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 is a little bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a score of 76 against 71.5. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Xiaomi Mi Note 2's body is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a lot better screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a quite better pixel density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a bigger screen. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM memory.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 and the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 both have very similar cameras, although the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a back facing camera with a way worse 23 mega-pixels resolution. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has improved battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a 23% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.