Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 12 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2022-06-23 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F4 is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with a score of 87.5 against 71.5. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F4 has the previous 12 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. Xiaomi Poco F4 is a just a bit lighter and a bit thinner phone than OSCAL Tiger 12.
Xiaomi Poco F4 features a little faster processor than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has way more brightness, a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little bigger display.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F4, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco F4 captures a lot better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have a 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.